Navigation



Click here to receive
e-alerts on important events and developments!

   
Find us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter!

Follow us on Twitter @WIReading



Contact Us

Do you have suggestions or feedback about our website? Contact us at wisconsinreading
coalition@gmail.com
.

The Front Burner: Take Action

Scroll down for information on the Read to Lead Blue Ribbon Task Force, NAEP Scores, State Legislation, DPI, and MPS

READ TO LEAD: GOVERNOR WALKER'S BLUE RIBBON READING TASK FORCE
WRC will provide ongoing information on the Governor's reading task force on this page. Scroll down for details on meeting agendas, guests, and summaries.

2/16/12: A public hearing on AB 558/SB 461 was held on February 15th at the State Capitol. Many people spoke for the Read-to-Lead provisions (universal early screening for students and a reading exam for teacher licensure), and no one spoke in opposition.

Click here for a summary of the hearing. You may also watch the entire hearing on Wisconsin Eye for free.

We are attaching some of the written statements from experts.
5 attachments — Download all attachments  
Sandra Stotsky Wisconsin_testimony.docSandra Stotsky Wisconsin_testimony.doc
87K   View   Download  
John Humphries Testimony for LRB 4017.docxJohn Humphries Testimony for LRB 4017.docx
15K   View   Download  
NCTQ Comments on Wisconsin Bill LRB4017_Feb 012 (2).docxNCTQ Comments on Wisconsin Bill LRB4017_Feb 012 (2).docx
50K   View   Download  
Louise Spear-Swerling testimony on WI bill AB 558.docLouise Spear-Swerling testimony on WI bill AB 558.doc
34K   View   Download  
Moats Moats Testimony Regarding Early Reading Instruction.docxMoats Moats Testimony Regarding Early Reading Instruction.docx
6K   View   Download  

Click here to read the text of the bill as it stands before amendment.

2/9/12: Note the time change! Reading legislation was released today. A public hearing will take place on Wednesday, February 15, beginning at 9:00 AM in Room 411 South at the State Capitol.  Bill highlights include universal kindergarten screening for reading readiness and a teacher licensure exam on the foundations of reading. Testify in person or send written comment by February 14 to Rep. Steve Kestell or Sen. Luther Olsen. This is your chance to be heard. The personal stories of parents, students, and teachers are very persuasive.


1/20/12: Gov. Walker announces that legislation will be coming soon on universal screening for young students and a new reading test for teacher licensure.

Read JS-Online coverage
Read DPI press release
Read Chippewa Herald coverage
Read Wis Politics coverage
Read Wisconsin Radio Network coverage


1/4/12: The Final Report of the Read to Lead Task Force has been
released.
Read the report.
Read Superintendent Tony Evers' statement on the report.

Read JSOnline comment by Erin Richards

10/3/11: The final meeting of the Governor's Read to Lead task force took place in Mosinee on Tuesday, September 27th. Click for a synopsis of the meeting, which included three guest speakers and attempted to arrive at consensus on a variety of issues. In addition to this summary, you can access Chan Stroman's Eduphilia tweets at http://twitter.com/#!/eduphilia

 A major achievement at this meeting was consensus on recommending use of the Massachusetts MTEL 90 reading test for teachers. Related issues of setting a passing score for that test and publishing pass rates linked to various colleges of education were not discussed. A second highlight was hearing from Professor Mark Seidenberg, Donald O. Hebb and Hilldale Professor of Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. As one of the nation’s leading reading researchers, his knowledge and advice should have been sought at the outset of the process.

Major unresolved issues over the course of the Task Force meetings include specifics on setting knowledge and practice content standards for teachers of reading, and identifying guidelines for determining whether a program, assessment, or training is “evidence-based.” Another unresolved issue is how to ensure appropriate implementation of the consensus items from the Task Force. Will implementation authority revert to the same people at the Department of Public Instruction and colleges of education who have guided us to our current level of underachievement? The concept of an independent Office of Reading Accountability was suggested by several task force members, but not discussed.

 It is encouraging that we may move to a universal screening tool for identification of reading risk factors, and we may adopt a rigorous reading exam for teachers, but it is not clear if, when, and how either will be mandated. The consensus items in the final report are likely to be general and short on specific details. If the Task Force had been pressed on the specifics, it is probable that consensus on many items would have rapidly dissolved.

A report on the conclusions of the Task Force is in progress in the Governor’s office and will be released soon. According to Governor Walker, he and Superintendent Evers will then work on implementation of the recommendations, with some people brought in to help. The rollout will include the substance of the Task Force recommendations as well as a general campaign to raise awareness of the importance of reading across the state.

9/25/11: Reminder: The final meeting of the Governor's Read to Lead task force is this Tuesday. It is open to the public.

  • Tuesday, September 27, 12:30 - 3:30 PM
  • Joseph Dessert Memorial Library
  • 123 Main Street
  • Mosinee, WI  54455
Read the meeting agenda
Read agenda items submitted by Steve Dykstra, Marcia Henry, and Tony Pedriana
Read the expanded definition of scientific research submitted for consideration by Steve Dykstra, Marcia Henry, and Tony Pedriana to supplement the federal definition, which WRC feels has not been applied with fidelity in Wisconsin.

9/16/11: The September 27th Read to Lead meeting has been moved to Mosinee. It will be at the Joseph Dessert Memorial Library, 123 Main Street, Mosinee, WI 54455 from 12:30 to 3:30 PM. Guests will include
Agenda details will be posted soon
9/5/11: The September 27th Read to Lead task force meeting will be in Wausau.
8/31/11: Capitol Conversation on reading reform with UW-Madison psychology professor Mark Seidenberg
8/29/11: Summary of the August 25th Read to Lead Meeting
8/29/11: Task force member Marcia Henry has an op-ed piece published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on August 28; Science can lead to better readers See the media page for responses.
8/27/11: Amy Hetzner discusses the open letters to the Read to Lead task force in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on August 24: Reading program plans questioned
8/18/11:
The next Read to Lead task force meeting will be in Green Bay.

  • Thursday, August 25; 11:30 am - 3:30 pm
  • Lambeau Field, Bart Starr room (4th floor)
  • 1265 Lombardi Avenue; enter at the Lambeau Field Atrium entrance (Miller Lite gate)

Meeting Agenda: The topics will be accountability as related to reading and societal issues that affect reading. Click for details. A last minute addition to the agenda is a presentation by the Department of Public Instruction on reading reforms in Milwaukee.

Background Material Provided to Task Force:

What other states are doing on accountability:

  1. State promotion/retention policies: http://www.ecs.org/ecs/ecscat.nsf/WebTopicView?OpenView&count=-1&RestrictToCategory=Students--Promotion/Retention
  2. State reading/literacy policies: http://www.ecs.org/ecs/ecscat.nsf/WebTopicView?OpenView&count=-1&RestrictToCategory=Reading/Literacy

Some studies on retention:

  1. http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/cr_49.pdf
  2. http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/p70.pdf
Information on Chicago's Summer Bridge program for struggling readers

8/4/11: Dan Gustafson's open letter to the reading task force was followed by a second letter from Dr. Gustafson and John Humphries, formerly with DPI.
8/2/11:
Wisconsin Eye has posted the July 29 meeting on its video archives. Search for "Read to Lead." Also see the PowerPoint from Florida's Foundation for Excellence in Education presentation.
7/31/11:
Read a summary of the July 29 Read to Lead Meeting
This meeting included a presentation of the reading initiatives in Florida that have resulted in dramatic performance growth over the past decade.
7/22/11: Neuropsychlogist Dan Gustafson sends an open letter to the task force.
How will the Common Core be implemented in Wisconsin? Who is in charge? This letter is a must-read!
7/21/11: The order of the agenda for the July 29 meeting has been announced.
7/18/11:
The agenda has been published for the July 29 meeting of the Governor's reading task force. Topics include a review and discussion of task force consensus items (teacher preparation and licensure, professional development for in-service teachers, screening and interventions, and early childhood) as well as a discussion of societal issues surrounding reading achievement. WRC members are likely to have strong opinions and valuable experience and expertise on fleshing out the specifics of the consensus items. After reading the agenda, you may send comments or concerns to Michael Brickman and Kimber Liedl and request that they be passed on to the task force members.

Guest speakers will be Patricia Levesque of the Foundation for Excellence in Education and Robert Pondiscio of the Core Knowledge Foundation.
Communications from the Governor's office indicate that Ms. Levesque will discuss her role in the success Florida had in improving reading outcomes, and Mr. Pondiscio will share his expertise on exactly how children learn to read as well as the difference between decoding and reading comprehension.

Superintendent Evers and DPI personnel will also give some details on the reading reforms they have begun to implement. A discussion of accountability issues will be carried over to the August meeting.

The meeting will be held from 1:00 to 4:30 PM at the Greater Milwaukee Foundation, 101 W. Pleasant Street, Suite 210, Milwaukee. All task force meetings are open to the public.

7/1/11: The next Read to Lead task force meeting will be Friday, July 29, from 1:00 to 4:30, at the offices of the Greater Milwaukee Foundation, 101 W. Pleasant Street, Suite 210, Milwaukee 53212. All task force meetings are open to the public. Click for directions.
6/28/11: Discussion at the June 24th meeting of the task force centered around assessment and intervention in the morning session, and early childhood issues in the afternoon. Superintendent Evers made three significant announcements: DPI is interested in considering a more rigorous teacher licensure examination, they are looking at the PALS assessments from Virginia as a possible early reading screening tool, and they will make corrections to the Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards concerning definitions and descriptions of phonological and phonemic awareness and phonics. Click here for a summary of the meeting and comments from WRC.
Note: WRC summaries and comments are a compilation of notes and impressions from WRC members who have attended meetings as observers. They should not be construed as official meeting minutes. If we become aware of other sources of information on the meetings, we will post them here.  Click here for tweets and comments on the May 31 meeting by Chan Stroman.

6/22/11:
Several outside experts will participate in the early childhood portion of the discussion at the 6/24 Read to Lead task force meeting. Brett Miller and James Griffin, who work with Peggy McCardle at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, will join the task force by phone. In addition, the meeting facilitators from American Institutes of Research have recommended their colleague, Eboni Howard. Ms. Howard will join the task force in person. Following are brief biographies.

Brett Miller, Ph.D., directs the Reading, Writing, and Related Learning Disabilities Program in the CDB Branch. Dr. Miller completed his Ph.D. at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in cognitive psychology and a postdoctoral fellowship at Haskins Laboratories in reading research. Dr. Miller¿s research program focuses on developing and supporting research and training initiatives to increase knowledge relevant to the development of reading and written-language abilities for learners with and without disabilities. This program supports research that includes work with diverse groups and includes a range of ages across the lifespan. Before joining the NICHD, Dr. Miller held the position of associate research scientist at the IES at the U.S. Department of Education. In this capacity, he served as program official for the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, the Mathematics and Science Education Research Program, and co-program officer for the Cognition and Student Learning Program.   

James A. Griffin, Ph.D., is the deputy chief of the CDB Branch and directs the Early Learning and School Readiness Program. Dr. Griffin holds a B.A. summa cum laude in psychology from the University of Cincinnati and a Ph.D. with honors in child clinical psychology from the University of Rochester. He completed a postdoctoral fellowship in psychiatric epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. Prior to his position at the NICHD, Dr. Griffin was a senior research analyst in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education. He previously served as the assistant director for Social, Behavioral, and Education Sciences in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Dr. Griffin’s career has focused on research and evaluation efforts related to service systems and early intervention programs designed to enhance the development and school readiness of children from at-risk and disadvantaged backgrounds. These efforts include several large-scale evaluations of the Head Start program (while with the Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, now the Administration for Children and Families) and research on preschool curricula involving geographically diverse child care, Head Start, and state pre-kindergarten programs (while with IES). Dr. Griffin currently serves as the science officer for the 15-year longitudinal NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, as well as the program officer for the Interagency School Readiness Consortium and the Interagency Consortium on Measures.

Eboni Howard, PhD, is the Principal Early Childhood Specialist at AIR. Dr. Howard is a mixed-method researcher with more than 19 years of experience conducting child and family research, evaluation, policy studies and advisory work. She leads AIR’s growing portfolio of early childhood/child development research, evaluation, and consultation projects. Currently she directs the evaluation of the Office of Head Start’s Early Learning Mentor Coach Initiative. She also provides consultation services to U.S. Department of Education’s Early Reading First Project about early childhood and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) on kindergarten assessment efforts.

Before joining AIR, she was the Frances Stott Chair in Early Childhood Policy and founding director of the Herr Research Center for Children and Social Policy at Erikson Institute, a graduate school focused on early childhood education. As director of the Herr Center she designed Illinois statewide evaluation of its birth-to-five programs, and facilitated the Chicago Program Evaluation Project of city’s 4-year old preschool programs. Prior to her work at Erikson, Dr. Howard was a senior researcher at Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago where she directed several large-scale evaluations in early childhood, home visitation, education, and child welfare. She also was a research associate concurrently with Joint Center for Poverty Research at Northwestern University and The Center for Culture and Health at UCLA where she conducted welfare-reform and child/family research.

Dr. Howard has presented extensively nationally and internationally, and has been highlighted in media and magazine outlets. She has served on a number of advisory boards including the National Research Council’s Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, Illinois’s Early Learning Council, and First 5 LA Research Advisory Committee. Howard earned her Doctorate and Master’s degree in human development and social policy from Northwestern University, and has a Bachelors of Arts in psychology from the University of Chicago.


6/16/11:
Below is the agenda for the June 24th Read to Lead task force meeting. The names of the Wisconsin early childhood experts who have been invited will be released soon.

Friday, June 24, 2011 10:30am-2:00pm (short break for lunch)

Onalaska Public Library
741 Oak Avenue South
Onalaska, WI 54650

I.       Intervention
A.    
When and how often should students be assessed?
B.    
Should the same measure be used each year or should different ones be used?
C.    
Should certain screening/testing measures be required?
D.    
Can these measures be used for all students or are different measures needed for special education and ELL students?  If so, which should be used?
E.     
Will DPI’s RtI measures, once fully implemented, be sufficient or will additional steps need to be taken?  If so, what?

II.    Early Childhood
A.    
How is literacy currently addressed in early childhood curriculum in a developmentally appropriate way?(daycares, WI Shares daycares, 4K)
B.    
What particular standards are used within Wisconsin early childhood teacher/caregiver preparation programs?
C.    
Should there be a required reading component for all publicly-funded early childhood programs?  If so, what?
D.    
Should early childhood reading standards be required throughout the state other than or in addition to existing standards?  If so, what?
E.     
Are there ways to ensure children enrolled in early childhood programs not receiving state subsidy have sufficient reading instruction?

6/10/11: The next four meetings of the Read to Lead task force are:

Friday, June 24, 2011, 10:30-2pm: Onalaska Public Library, 741 Oak Avenue South, Onalaska, WI  54650
Friday, July 29, 1-4pm

Thursday, August 25, 10am-2pm
Tuesday, September 27, 12:30-3:30pm

With the exception of the the June meeting, locations have not yet been confirmed. Check back for locations and agendas.All meetings are open to the public.

6/1/11: Governor Walker's Read to Lead task force met on May 31st at the State Capitol. Following are observations from WRC.
Note: Peggy Stern, an Oscar-winning filmmaker currently working on a project about dyslexia, had a crew filming the meeting. If we are able to acquire footage, we will make it available. If you would like Wisconsin Eye to record future meetings, please contact them at comments@wiseye.org.

Format:
Unlike the first task force meeting, this meeting was guided by two facilitators from AIR, the American Institutes for Research. This was a suggestion of Senator Luther Olsen, and the facilitators were procured by State Superintendent Tony Evers. Evers and Governor Walker expressed appreciation at not having to be concerned with running the meeting, but there were some problems with the round-robin format chosen by the facilitators. Rather than a give-and-take discussion, as happened at the first meeting, this was primarily a series of statements from people at the table. There was very little opportunity to seek clarification or challenge statements. Time was spent encouraging everyone to comment on every question, regardless of whether they had anything of substance to contribute, and the time allotted to individual task force members varied. Some were cut off before finishing, while others were allowed to go on at length. As a direct result of this format, the conversation was considerably less robust than at the first meeting.

Topics: The range of topics proved to be too ambitious for the time allowed. Teacher preparation and professional development took up the bulk of the time, followed by a rather cursory discussion of assessment tools. The discussion of reading interventions was held over for the next meeting.

Guests:
Dawnene Hassett, Asst. Prof. of Curriculum and Instruction and new elementary literacy chair, UW-Madison
Tania Mertzman Habeck, Assoc. Prof. of Curriculum and Instruction, UW-Milwaukee
Mary Jo Ziegler, Reading Consultant, Wis. Department of Public Instruction
Troy Couillard, Special Education Team, Wis. Department of Public Instruction

Next Meetings: The Governor's office will work to set up a schedule of meetings for the next several months. Some of the meetings may be in other parts of the state.

5/27/11: Michael Brickman releases meeting notice and agenda

5/25/11:
Task Force member Anthony Pedriana, former teacher and principal in Milwaukee Public Schools and author of Leaving Johnny Behind, explains his service on the task force in a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel opinion piece Tony was also a guest on the Joy Cardin show on Wisconsin Public Radio on Thursday, May 26, from 7-8 AM. Listen to program # 110526B on audio archive.  Read a letter to Tony from an MPS teacher.
5/25/11: Chan Stroman, Madison attorney and parent, blogs and tweets on education issues, including the Governor's task force. 

5/14/11: Following is the agenda for the May 31st Task Force meeting. University professors will be invited to the discussion.
I. Teacher Training and Professional Development
    A. University Level
        1. How are Wisconsin teachers trained in reading?
        2. Has this changed over time?
        3. How can these measures be improved?
        4. How could requirements for teacher licensure be strengthened to better prepare future teachers for reading                 instruction?
    B. Professional Development
        1. What types of professional development do Wisconsin teachers receive related to reading instruction?
        2. How can they be improved?
        3. Can this be accomplished through the use of reading coaches or teacher in-service days?
        4. To what extent should specific teaching strategies or methods be mandated and/or encouraged by the                    state?
        5. What grades should receive this? Kindergarten? Grades 1-3? 4th grade on?
II. Intervention
    A. Screening/testing measures
        1. Which screening/testing measures are in use today?
        2. How can screening/testing measures be improved?
        3. Which specific testing tools would be most effective and cost efficient?
        4. How might these measures be implemented differently for special needs and ELL students?
    B. Intervention
        1. What steps are DPI and school districts taking to improve interventions?
        2. Should any additional steps be taken?
    C. To what extent should specific reading measures be mandated and/or encouraged by the state?
        1. For elementary schools?
        2. For 4K programs?
        3. For early childhood programs (Head Start, WI Shares, Private)?
    D. How quickly could improved intervention methods be implemented?

5/7/11: The second meeting of the Governor's Read to Lead Task Force will be held on Tuesday, May 31st, from 1:00 to 4:00 PM. The meeting will be in the Governor's Conference Room, 115 East, in the State Capitol. All meetings are open to the public. The agenda has not yet been distributed.

4/25/11:

 
Today's first meeting of the Governor's Read to Lead Reading Task Force can be viewed in the Wisconsin Eye archives at
http://www.wiseye.org/Programming/VideoArchive/EventDetail.aspx?evhdid=4126

A wide variety of topics were discussed at the April 25th meeting, including levels of reading achievement in Wisconsin and other states, the importance of early childhood preparation and prompt intervention for struggling readers, different approaches to teaching reading, teacher preparation and professional development, and examples of best practices in reading instruction both within and outside of our state. We encourage you to view the archived video for a better understanding of the information shared and opinions expressed.

Future meetings of the task force will be held approximately once a month, with the next meeting focusing on preparation of teachers in institutions of higher education. Suggestions were made to to bring in representatives of higher education in Wisconsin, as well as experts in essential knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading.

You may be interested in several media reports of the April 25th meeting.
WisPolitics.com: http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=234474
The Cap Times: http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/education/blog/article_3b04ede4-6f5b-11e0-b0d4-001cc4c002e0.html
JSOnline: http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/120624974.html

4/23/11: The first meeting of the Task Force will be shown live on Wisconsin Eye, available through some cable providers and also at www.wiseye.org. Monday, April 25, 9-11 AM
4/20/11: General and detailed agenda for the April 25th meeting of the task force are as follows:
General:
Introductions
Welcome and opening remarks by Governor Walker on the mission of the Task Force
A discussion of the current state of reading achievement in Wisconsin
A discussion of current practices as well as ways to improve reading instruction at the classroom level in Wisconsin
A discussion of future topics and future meeting dates
Adjournment
Detailed
I. Identifying the problem and its roots causes

    A. An overview of the problem in Wisconsin
    B. What are some of the root causes of illiteracy?
        1. Teaching methods and curriculum
        2. Teacher training and professional development
        3. Problematic interventions
        4. Societal problems
        5. Lack of accountability
        6. Others?
    C. Why are we doing so much worse than many other states and so much worse, relative to other states, than         we did in the past?

II. Reading Instruction
   
A. How are children typically taught to read in Wisconsin schools?
    B. How do early childhood programs fit into the equation?
    C. How might reading instruction be improved?
    D. How do these methods and curricula differ with ELL & special needs students/
    E. How quickly could improved reading instruction be implemented?
A NAEP score data sheet compiled with the assistance of task force and WRC member Steve Dykstra was included with the detailed agenda.

4/16/11: Governor Walker's blue ribbon task force, Read to Lead, will have its first meeting on Monday, April 25, 2011, from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM. The meeting will be held in the Governor's conference room, 115 East, in the State Capitol. All meetings are open to the public. In addition, WRC will prepare reports on the progress of the task force and post them on this page of our website. Questions on the task force can be addressed to Kimber Liedl or Michael Brickman in the Governor's office at 608-267-9096.

In preparation for the meeting, the Governor's office made this comment:

 "As the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s education columnist observed on Sunday, “[t]his is not your ordinary task force.”  The creation of this task force is an opportunity to improve reading instruction and achievement in our state in an effort to open new opportunities for thousands of children.  The MJS also noted that our task force “has diversity of opinion.”  This is by design.  Governor Walker is not looking for a rubber stamp, but for a robust, yet focused, conversation that will ultimately lead to concrete policy solutions." 

4/10/11: Read Alan Borsuk's column on the upcoming blue ribbon reading task force from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:  http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/119546744.html

4/5/11: Governor Scott Walker has named a blue ribbon task force to recommend legislation to ensure that all Wisconsin students read proficiently by the end of third grade. Members include Wisconsin Reading Coalition founding member Steve Dykstra, Past President of the International Dyslexia Association Marcia Henry, former MPS principal and author Tony Pedriana, former teacher and Rowland Reading Foundation associate Linda Pils, and Wisconsin Literacy's Michele Erikson. Rounding out the panel are Rachel Lander from the Value Added Research Center at UW-Madison, Mara Brown from Jefferson Elementary in Oshkosh, Mary Read from the Greater Milwaukee Foundation, State Reps. Steve Kestell and Jason Fields, State Sen. Luther Olsen, State Superintendent Tony Evers, and Kathy Champeau from Wisconsin State Reading Association. Gov. Walker will chair the panel.

March, 2011: Gov. Scott Walker's Budget proposed the blue ribbon task force to make recommendations on third grade reading proficiency.

Citing the importance of basic reading skills, as outlined in the 2010 Annie E. Casey Foundation report, Early Warning! Why Reading by the End of Third Grade Matters, and Wisconsin's drop from 3rd to 30th in the nation on the 4th grade NAEP reading test, Walker proposes appointing a blue ribbon task force to plan a literacy initiative that will include a testing program in the early grades to identify students with reading difficulties. He would provide $600,000 to the Department of Administration in each of the fiscal years of the budget to develop and implement the recommendations of the task force. 

The language on this initiative can be found on pages 10 and 42-44 of the Budget, found on pages 32 and 64-66 at the budget link above.



NAEP RESULTS

Wisconsin's 2011 NAEP Scores Again Disappointing

The 2011 4th and 8th grade NAEP reading and math scores were released November 1, 2011. You can view the results at http://nationsreportcard.gov.  The presentation webinar is at http://www.nagb.org/reading-math-2011/.

Click here for an analysis of the reading scores.

The NAEP scores are discussed in a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article.

Read commentary on Wisconsin's NAEP reading scores that was sent to the Governor's Read to Lead task force by task force member Steve Dykstra.

 


2009 NAEP Scores Show Drop in 4th Grade Reading in Wisconsin


The reading scores from the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress
were released on March 24, 2010. In critical 4th grade reading, Wisconsin has lost ground again. Our average score dropped by three points, which is a mere 0.3% from being statistically significant. Fifteen years ago, we were 12 points above the national average. We have fallen four points, while the national average has risen eight. Since 2007, our national ranking slipped from 25th to around 30th. Only 7% of our students score in the advanced level. 33% score below basic. For subgroups, the news is worse. Percentages of students scoring below basic grew in each category: low income students (54%), African American students (66%), and students with disabilities (73%). Wisconsin African Americans had the lowest scores in the country, and low income student performance fell in with the lowest 10 states in the nation. Click here for more information on the 2009 NAEP results. Click here for more statistics on the performance of the main subgroups of students.

2011 NAEP Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) Results Show Milwaukee is Still Near the Bottom

The scores from the NAEP Trial Urban Districts Assessment were released December 7th, and Milwaukee Public Schools again ranked at or near the bottom in all measures of reading.  Erin Richards discusses the results in an article in JSOnline, including comments from MPS Chief Academic Officer, Heidi Ramirez.  All the scores can be accessed through the NAEP site.

MPS averages:

  • Since the 2009 TUDA, the MPS scores have not gone up, and the performance gaps have not narrowed.
  • MPS is in the bottom 5 of 21 tested cities for both 4th and 8th grade reading.

In 4th grade:
  • For students who get a free lunch, MPS ranks 19th out of 21.
  • For students who don't get a free lunch, MPS ranks 17th out of 20.
  • For black students, MPS rank 20th out of 20... last.
  • For white students, MPS ranks 20th out of 20... last.
  • For Hispanic students, MPS ranks 17th out of 20.
  • For black students who get a free lunch, MPS ranks last. 
  • For white students who get a free lunch, MPS ranks last.
  • For white students who don't get a free lunch, MPS ranks 3rd from last.


2009 NAEP Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) Results Show Milwaukee is Near the Bottom

The reading scores from the 2009 NAEP TUDA tests were released on May 20th, 2010. Milwaukee Public Schools scores are near the bottom. In 4th grade, 61% of MPS students scored below basic, 27% basic, 10% proficient, and 2% advanced. For black students, 71% were below basic, 23% basic, 6% proficient, and less than .5% advanced. This is worse than all participating urban districts except Detroit, and MPS bested them by only one scale score point in this category. 
See full results
See archived video of the press conference announcing the results
Read Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Article
Read Wisconsin Reading Coalition Commentary



    Take Action:
    Step 1: Read about the problems in your local newspaper and in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

        (Compare the above article with the tone of the press release from DPI regarding WI's 2009 NAEP scores)
    Opinion Letter by Steven Dykstra: Let's roll up our sleeves and teach kids to read
    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Editorial: Accountability will improve MPS reading scores
    Column by Eugene Kane: Reading test scores are terrible, but let's not write black kids off
    Opinion by Willie L. Hines Jr.: No more excuses: Focus on reading
   
    Step 2: Read about responses like the Milwaukee Summer Reading Project 2010
    
Project Director Dr. Patricia Ellis 

    
Marquette University Institute for the Transformation of Learning

    Howard L. Fuller, PhD, Founder and Director

    The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel urges an expansion of the Reading Project    
    
    Step 3: 
Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper about Wisconsin's falling NAEP scores and                    actions to address the problem.
    Click here for a list of Wisconsin newspapers.


RE-CAP OF 2009-10 LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS

AB 583 and AB 584 were introduced on November 16, 2009, by Representative Keith Ripp.

AB 583 called for a supplemental licensure examination in the foundations of reading for elementary and special education teachers and reading specialists. It also directed DPI to provide training to practicing teachers in the knowledge and skills areas covered by that exam. The topics of the proposed exam were based on exams required in Massachusetts and Connecticut, and under development in Minnesota. Click here for a discussion of support and opposition to AB 583.

AB 584 called for universal screening of all students in grades K-2, and lower performing students in grades 3-5, for possible risk factors in reading. The screening would cover phonemic awareness and rapid naming. Click here for a discussion of support and opposition to AB-584.


Current Status: Both bills were assigned to the Assembly Committee on Education, chaired by Rep. Sondy Pope-Roberts of Verona, but no hearings were held. Rep. Pope-Roberts and Sen. John Lehman, chair of the Senate Committee on Education, requested a Legislative Study Committee on Response to Intervention during summer, 2010, where many of these reading issues could be discussed, possibly leading to a recommendation for legislation. In May, the Joint Legislative Council, chaired by Sen. Fred Risser and Rep. Marlin Schneider, despite the efforts of many Wisconsin Reading Coalition members, decided not to recommend this study committee. Click here for a list of the recommended study committees. Rep. Pope-Roberts then initiated an alternative process involving informal discussions between legislators, DPI, WEAC, and reading advocates, with the goal of considering possible changes to the administrative rules (see below). Only two meetings were held, on July 7 and November 11, and DPI has discontinued that discussion forum. As a result of the elections of November, 2010, the chairmanships of the Assembly and Senate Education Committees passed to Republicans Rep. Steve Kestell and Sen. Luther Olsen. The new legislative session is likely to bring re-introduction of bills on reading. It is possible that Governor-elect Scott Walker's Education Plan or the Read to Lead task force may have some influence in this process.


DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION: ADMINISTRATIVE RULES & STANDARDS

Inadequacies of Wisconsin's Vision for Response to Intervention

Wisconsin has a new SLD Rule, which will require using the Response to Intervention process to guide the identification of students with Specific Learning Disabilities beginning in December, 2013. Students in general education will be screened periodically in reading (plus other academic subjects and behavior). Those found to be at risk will receive intervention and have their progress monitored. Students not on track to return to grade- or age-level performance in a reasonable amount of time, or requiring a level of support that cannot be maintained in general education, will be considered for special education.

In order to implement successful interventions with as many struggling readers as possible, and to ensure that SLD diagnoses are accurate and timely, it is critical that the interventions used in RtI be scientific research-based, and that the screening and progress monitoring tools be reliable and valid. Wisconsin Reading Coalition and other organizations are concerned that DPI's guidance on the implementation of RtI, as published in Response to Intervention: A Guiding Document, is inadequate to accomplish these goals. Three later documents issued by DPI do not remedy that situation. They further separate the systems change concept of RTI, which is optional in Wisconsin, from the screening and intervention process that results in some children being identified with SLD.

When we talk about improving reading performance in Wisconsin, or any state, we consider the quality of our teachers and the quality of the instructional programs and assessment tools used. RtI is the framework by which instructional programs and assessment tools will be defined in Wisconsin. Stay up-to-date by reading comments by Wisconsin Reading Coalition, Wisconsin Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, and Wisconsin School Psychologists Association.  


Reading Position Filled at Department of Public Instruction

Mary Jo Ziegler has been appointed the new Reading Consultant for DPI, taking the place of the recently retired  Jacqueline Karbon.

Ms. Ziegler can be reached at mary.ziegler@dpi.wi.gov.

Wisconsin Applies for Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program Grant

The future of the competitive, discretionary grant phase of the Striving Readers program is uncertain, as funding was eliminated on March 2, 2011 by Congress in the stop-gap funding bill. For further information, see the Curriculum Matters blog by Erik Robelen in Education Week. The department of education announced the complete application process on March 10, despite uncertain funding.  Wisconsin submitted a full application by the May 9, 2011 deadline.

Wisconsin was one of many states to receive a $150,000 grant to form a state literacy team and create a comprehensive state literacy plan. This plan was submitted to the federal government on February 1st as part of an application for a $30 to $50 million dollar discretionary grant for implementing the plan. In some other states, the team selection process was open, including a public nomination process. In Wisconsin, the team was chosen in a closed process within the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. A number of WRC members expressed concern about this process, resulting in the following e-mail from WRC to State Superintendent Anthony Evers:

Dear Dr. Evers:

 I am conveying concerns expressed by a number of members of the Wisconsin Reading Coalition relating to the process by which a state literacy team was formed to work on Wisconsin’s Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy grant application. The details of the process are unclear, but the assumption is that the selection was controlled by the same people who have been responsible for the student and teacher standards and practices over the past decade, as Wisconsin’s national ranking on the NAEP reading exam has slipped from 3rd to 30th..

 People from such organizations as Wisconsin Reading Coalition, Wisconsin Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, Disability Rights Wisconsin, and Quality Education Coalition are conspicuously absent from the team, as are Milwaukee community stakeholders who have been advocating on behalf of our state's lowest-performing children. Within these groups, there is substantial expertise in the science of reading acquisition, the etiology and treatment of reading disabilities, and the particular needs of socio-economic at-risk populations. Members of WRC and WIBIDA work on a regular basis with people who are included on the literacy teams of other, higher-performing states.

 By keeping the team formation process closed to the public, Wisconsin has forfeited an opportunity to bring a new perspective to raising student reading achievement and possibly to increase competitiveness for one of the $30 - $50 million dollar discretionary grants. We urge you to make the team membership public, along with an explanation of which members are deemed to meet the particular areas of required expertise, and the process and names of the persons responsible for selecting the team. If you determine that the team should be expanded, we are confident that you will find qualified and willing participants within the organizations mentioned above. If we can be of any assistance in identifying possible participants, please do not hesitate to contact us.

As a result of this communication, WRC was invited to place one member on the state literacy team. Work occurred in late December, 2010, and January, 2011, and the State Literacy Plan was submitted to the Department of Education on February 1. The plan was to have been made available for public comment in February, but we have not seen that occur yet.


The "SLD Rule" is Final

In 2004, the federal government, through IDEA, changed the way in which schools must evaluate children for specific learning disabilities (SLD). States may no longer require a discrepancy between IQ and achievement in making the SLD determination, and must permit a process based on the child's response to scientifically-based interventions, commonly known as Response to Intervention, or RtI. This "SLD Rule," effective December 1, 2010, is intended to bring Wisconsin into alignment with federal law. Under this rule, within three years, all districts in Wisconsin must switch over to RtI for identification of students with SLD.

DPI  released a report which included comments received at public hearing, and their responses to those comments. Wisconsin Reading Coalition developed a Reaction to the Proposed Rules on Identification of Students with Specific Learning Disabilities, and discussed various wording concerns at a stakeholder meeting with DPI on September 13, 2010. At that same meeting, representatives of the Wisconsin School Administrators Alliance argued for a further two-year delay in the implementation of the rule, and the Wisconsin State Reading Association argued in general against the SLD Rule as being too prescriptive, too reliant on normed assessments, and too focused on intervening in discrete reading skills.  After this stakeholder meeting, DPI elected not to make any changes in the SLD Rule. The Wisconsin State Reading Association issued a call to action for its members against the SLD Rule, claiming that it will set Wisconsin back 20 years in reading instruction.

DPI Issues Guidelines for Implementation of Response to Intervention (RTI)

The Department of Public Instruction has issued Wisconsin Response to Intervention: A Guiding Document.
This 17-page guide provides a number of answers to questions asked by stakeholders about RTI in Wisconsin. It includes a glossary, a model for RTI, discussion of culturally-relevant practices, and more. See "Inadequacies of Wisconsin's Vision for Response to Intervention," above, for comments. DPI later issued three additional documents concerning the relationship between RTI and the process for identifying students with learning disabilities. These documents are intended to help schools prepare for the new SLD identification process, while at the same time clarifying that adopting RTI for all students is not required in Wisconsin.

DPI Discontinues Reading Discussions

Wisconsin Reading Coalition was involved in discussions which we hoped would examine ways to bring science-based reading to all classrooms in Wisconsin through changes in the Administrative Code. On July 7, 2010, in Madison, WRC participated in a meeting called by Assembly Education Chair Sondy Pope-Roberts. Other invitees included the Wisconsin Branch of the International Dyslexia Association, the Learning Difference Network of Verona, the Department of Public Instruction, WEAC, and Rep. Keith Ripp. Also present were staffers from the offices of Pope-Roberts, Ripp, and Rep. Joan Ballweg.  Wisconsin State Reading Association elected not to attend. A follow-up meeting, also attended by members of the Wisconsin State Reading Association, was held on November 11, 2010.

PI-34 (Teacher Education Approval and Licenses) and PI-8 (School District Standards) are the main rules which impact reading instruction in Wisconsin. WRC proposed five main issues for discussion:

  • Science-based instruction and intervention in schools
  • Science-based early screening, progress monitoring, and summative assessment in schools
  • Revision of the Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards to align with the Common Core State Standards
  • Improved teacher preparation in institutions of higher education
  • A rigorous content knowledge exam in reading instruction for teacher candidates (e.g., the MTEL 90 Foundations of Reading exam)

At the July 7th meeting, we presented our concerns, but were unable to engage the other participants in a dialogue. Rep. Pope-Roberts requested DPI to follow up by setting another meeting. We sent a detailed statement of our concerns a few weeks later. DPI was not able to schedule a meeting until November 11th. DPI set the agenda for the November 11th meeting, which included DPI presentations on a variety of topics:

  • Wisconsin's participation in the multi-state SMARTER assessment consortium, which is developing student assessments for grades 3-8 and one grade in high school. These assessments will take the place of the WKCE when they are finished in several years.
  • The Common Core State Standards, which provide explicit grade-level standards in reading for students
  • The INTASC Standards revisions, which were generally presented favorably, though acknowledging insufficient teacher content knowledge standards
  • Wisconsin's regular cycle of review of content area teacher licensure exams, with the next areas of consideration being speech, science, and social studies
  • Institutions of Higher Education, which DPI feels are making progress in following a process of continuous review
  • DPI's intention to issue guidelines on the implementation of the new SLD Rule, particularly in the areas of administrative forms and multiple measures of assessment
  • The Wisconsin RTI Center's intention to begin highlighting best practices in RTI among state school districts
  • Wisconsin's intent to apply for a grant from the federal Striving Readers program by February 1, 2011, with a comprehensive state literacy plan to be conceived by a "broad-based team of content and learning specialists" that has been nominated by a DPI group including Jacque Karbon and Emile Amundsen.
WRC attempted to open a dialogue on such issues as the lack of common assessments for students in the critical reading years of grades K-2, the lack of consistent early screening for reading risk factors, the need to revise the Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards to align with the Common Core, the need for better pre-service preparation of teacher candidates and in-service professional development of teachers in the science of reading, the poor quality and lack of rigor in our teacher licensure exams in the area of reading instruction, and the advisability of consulting with the Wisconsin School Psychologists Association and other experts in drafting guidelines for RTI implementation. We were generally unsuccessful at initiating any meaningful exchange of ideas. Wisconsin State Reading Association members did offer that they know how to recognize struggling readers without assessment tools, and they know what to do to help them. However, they feel they are hampered by student absenteeism, student "mental illness," and reduced numbers of reading specialists in schools.

DPI declared that no further meetings of this group will be held. In their opinion, they have heard our point of view on the issues, and no further discussion is required. They feel their current initiatives will resolve existing problems. Advocates were encouraged to contact DPI's Troy Couillard with concerns about RTI implementation, and Sharon Suchla regarding teacher licensure.

WRC will continue its efforts to effect statewide, systemic change in reading instruction for all children, including early identification of and intervention for at-risk students. We will also continue to push for changes to teacher preparation and in-service professional development that will allow our dedicated teachers to be more effective with students.


Revision of English Language Arts Standards: Adopting the Common Core
The Wisconsin English Language Arts Model Academic Standards are changing for the first time since 1998. On June 2, 2010, Wisconsin adopted the Common Core Standards, which are a positive step forward for early reading instruction. The Common Core Standards for Reading: Foundational Skills K-3 is a definite improvement over both the 1998 standards and the locally-drafted 2009 proposed standards. Click here for a side-by-side comparison of beginning reading standards from Wisconsin, Milwaukee Public Schools, Florida, and the Common Core.

Wisconsin's 1998 ELA standards were criticized by national organizations and by members of the team that wrote them as being vague, lacking rigor, and failing to adequately address the five essential components of early reading: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary development, and comprehension. The new version proposed by DPI in 2009 focused heavily on secondary school outcomes based on the work of the Partnership for 21st Century and the American Diploma Project. The standards for early reading were not enhanced. The Common Core, on the other hand, was drafted with assistance from nationally-recognized reading experts, and includes specific grade level standards for beginning readers. Click here for commentary on the positive aspects of the Common Core and some concerns about implementation.

MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Performance Facts
Instruction is no worse in Milwaukee Public Schools than in other districts across the state. However, given the demographics of the student body, the results of poor instruction are more apparent in that district, and, given the size of the district, the results are of critical importance to the state. Milwaukee Public Schools is a District Identified for Improvement (DIFI) in reading under No Child Left Behind. On the 2009 NAEP Trial Urban District Assessment, 61% of 4th graders and 71% of black 4th graders scored below basic (lower than all particpating districts except Detroit). Even under the low standards of the WKCE, 38% of MPS fourth graders read below the performance cutoff set by Wisconsin for proficiency. 35% of 8th graders and 55% of 10th graders also fail to reach the proficient level.  On the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 66% of Wisconsin's African American students, heavily represented in MPS, scored below basic. These are the nation’s lowest scores for this subgroup, and the gap between black and white students in Wisconsin is the second largest in the country.

Resistance to Change
DPI has issued a corrective action plan for MPS, but the district is not in compliance. State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Evers, in a letter to U.S. Representative Gwen Moore on February 9, 2010, said that "MPS has notified DPI both orally and in writing as recently as January 25, 2010 that the district has no intention of fully complying with the state's requirements."

Report of the External Literacy Team
In December of 2008, in response to a DPI directive based on the DIFI status of MPS, MPS assembled an external team to recommend an approach to improving reading in MPS.  The resulting report recommended a plan built around a "range of reading materials and other resources on different topics and difficulty levels tied to their interests, background, and literacy learning needs" and envisioned interventions "where struggling readers select the texts they will read from a wide assortment of interesting texts, and are afforded reading-to-learn opportunities that involve a more expanded view of literacy and literacy development."  DIBELS assessments and practices having to do with Direct Instruction or Reading First were denigrated. This Report was criticized both for its content as well as for the misleading way in which it cited reading research.

MPS Comprehensive Literacy Plan and New Core Reading Programs
MPS is long overdue in developing a plan for improving reading. After submitting several  proposals to DPI, the MPS Comprehensive Literacy Plan has been approved with important conditions. Click here for a discussion of the current version of the CLP. Click here for a discussion of a previous CLP draft. Click here for a side-by-side comparison of beginning reading standards in MPS, Wisconsin, the Common Core, and Florida. 

MPS has selected new core reading programs for use beginning in the 2010-11 school year. Pre-K will use PK-Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, grades K-5 will use Journeys-Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, and grades 6-8 will use Literature-McDougal-Littell. English Language Learner programs in grades K-5 will use Reach-National Geographic, and ELL programs in grades 6-8 will use Inside-National Geographic. In addition, Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) will be used as a new benchmark assessment tool.

Jamie S. Settlement Agreement
On February 3, 2012, The 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against Disability Rights Wisconsin in the 11-year-old "Jamie S." case
involving special education in Milwaukee Public Schools. The 2008 settlement agreement between DRW and the Department of Public Instruction, which led to the appointment of independent expert Alan Coulter and the institution of a compliance plan, was thrown out. MPS Superintendent Gregory Thornton indicated that MPS
"will continue to provide quality special education services for Milwaukee’s children," but DRW managing attorney Jeff Spitzer-Resnick said he was not only disappointed, but that the ruling potentially raises obstacles that could thwart future class-action special education lawsuits under IDEA."  "This fight is not over yet," said Spitzer-Resnick.
Click here
for Milwaukee Journal Sentinel coverage

The Jamie S. case was brought against MPS and DPI in 2001 for failing to identify and provide appropriate services to students in MPS who should have been identified for special education. The independent expert appointed by the district federal court to carry out the 2008 Jamie S. Settlement Agreement, Alan Coulter, issued a plan that required MPS to provide classroom reading instruction and early intervening services using scientific, research-based curricula. Compliance with this plan was also included in DPI’s Corrective Action Requirements for MPS. MPS did not agree to comply with the court order.  Coulter issued a report on the "very troubling start" during MPS's first year under the compliance plan.

Giving More Power to the State Superintendent
Go to the media page for current articles on MPS's progress on the improvement plan and legislation giving the State Superintendent authority to implement these reforms.